Ohio voters rejected a ballot measure that would have legalized the recreational and medical use of marijuana in the state, the Associated Press reported. The proposal would have only permitted a small set of investors to control the commercial pot industry. Votes are still being tallied, but the measure is currently losing 65 percent to 35 percent, according to the Columbus Dispatch, with more than 70 percent of the vote counted. Known as Issue 3, the measure would have amended Ohio’s state Constitution to legalize recreational and medical marijuana use by permitting anyone 21 years and older to purchase and grow marijuana. Medicinal pot use would have been permitted for anyone with a valid medical condition. However, the proposal also sparked criticism because of the way it would have governed and regulated the commercial marijuana industry. Under Issue 3, only 10 commercial growing licenses would have been issued, meaning no other companies or organizations would have been allowed to sell pot to retailers. Additionally, the number of stores allowed to sell the drug would have been limited to 1,100. Due to these restrictions, Issue 3 was divisive even among those who support legalizing marijuana. Critics argued that the measure would create a monopoly, while supporters believed that the heavy regulations were worth dealing with if it meant legalization. “Issue 3 was nothing more and nothing less than a business plan to seize control of the recreational marijuana market in Ohio, » said Curt Steiner, campaign director for Ohioans Against Marijuana Monopolies, to the Dispatch. Ohio Governor John Kasich welcomed the results. “At a time when too many families are being torn apart by drug abuse, Ohioans said no to easy access to drugs and instead chose a path that helps strengthen our families and communities,” he said in a statement. Notably, the group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition argued that Issue 3 should have been supported. « Legalization will take money away from the cartels, provide funding for public safety and health services, and reduce the violence associated with the illegal drug market, » retired Cincinnati Police Captain Howard Rahtz said in a statement from the group, according to the Huffington Post. « Passage of Issue Three puts us in charge, not the dealers »

In the newly-released video, five Islamic State (IS, formely ISIS/ISIL) jihadists are seen sitting outside as one of them praises militants in the Sinai Peninsula for allegedly bringing down the Russian A321 passenger jet with 224 people on board.

Surrounded by four fellow jihadists, a Slavic-looking man speaking both in Russian and Arabic, addresses President Vladimir Putin, warning the Russian leader that he would regret targeting ISIS in Syria.

With a knife in hand, he threatens to continue taking down planes, invading countries, and killing people in retaliation for Russia’s military operation in Syria.

Islamic State first attempted to claim responsibility for bringing down the Airbus 321 shortly after the plane crashed en route from Egypt’s Sharm-el-Sheikh to St. Petersburg on October 31.

However, the claim was quickly rejected by both Russian and Egyptian officials as “unlikely.”

The US State Department echoed the refutation, saying that it “has no indication of terrorists taking down” the plane, either.

While officials have stressed no version can be ruled out entirely until the investigation is complete, there are reasonable grounds to believe that ISIS-affiliated militants fighting on the ground in Sinai are not behind the crash.

Both officials and experts are united in their opinion that the jihadists only possess man-portable air defense systems incapable of reaching the 9,450 meter (31,000 foot) altitude of the high-flying Airbus.

“As far as it is known, Islamic State and its affiliate groups don’t have the capability to bring down aircraft flying at the height that this aircraft reportedly was, which is something around 10,000 meters,”security analyst and former UK counter-terrorism officer Charles Shoebridge told RT.

At present, conflicting reports on the passenger jet’s fate are rampant in the media, however.

On Tuesday, an Egyptian doctor who examined the passengers’ bodies said that the nature of their injuries led him to suggest that “a powerful explosion took place aboard the plane before it hit the ground.”

A bomb explosion aboard the plane had been mentioned earlier as one possible cause of the crash.

However, Russian and Egyptian experts reportedly failed to find any blast-related trauma during their preliminary examination of the bodies.

“There were no signs of an explosion impact found during the preliminary examination,” an unnamed source told TASS news agency.

So far, Egyptian investigators are inclined to favor mechanical damage or technical malfunction as the most likely cause.

Meanwhile, an unnamed Russian investigator told RIA Novosti that media reports citing sources close to the investigation are “negatively impacting” the progress of the probe, as preliminary conclusions are misinforming the public and complicating things for the investigating officials.

The situation is expected to become clearer after the data is recovered from the plane’s flight recorders, but that process is expected to take up to four weeks.